The World This Week

Photo Source: New York Times
   NIAS Course on Global Politics
National Institute of Advanced Studies (NIAS)
Indian Institute of Science Campus, Bangalore
For any further information or to subscribe to GP alerts send an email to subachandran@nias.res.in

CWA # 91, 4 March 2019
The World This Week
India in OIC, India-Pakistan and Trump-Kim Summit

  GP Team

India was invited by the OIC for the first time after 50 years. On the other hand, Pakistan boycotted an OIC meeting due to India’s presence. Between India and Pakistan, tensions continue despite the military de-escalation. And in Hanoi, Trump and Kim failed to walk the talk.

Lakshmi V Menon, Sourina Bej and Seetha Lakshmi Dinesh

ISSSP, NIAS

 

India in OIC

 

Despite Pakistan’s attempts to scuttle India’s Organisation of Islamic Countries (OIC) invite, Sushma Swaraj,India’s external affairs minister on 1 March 2019,  attended the inaugural plenary meeting held in Abu Dhabi, as the guest of honour. Pakistan in objection to Swaraj’s presence boycotted the event.

With 57 members, OIC is the second largest intergovernmental organization, after the United Nations. This is the first time India is being invited. Although Qatar in 2002 proposed the ‘Observer’ status for India, presently India is neither a member nor an observer. At a time when India’s ties with West Asia, particularly the UAE is growing stronger the invite is a milestone.

Amidst skirmishes and Imran Khan’s decision to release Abhinandan Varthaman as a “peace gesture”, Sushma Swaraj highlighted India’s diversity, need for counter terrorism cooperation and condemned terror-funding states while also emphasizing India’s bolstering relations with West Asia. Swaraj in her address, while quoting surats from the Qur’an made clear that the fight against terror was not one against any religion. She attributed the menace of terrorism to “distortion of religion” and “misguided belief”.

A blow, the OIC’s passing of Kashmir resolution and its condemning of “Indian terrorism” and “mass blindings” was rejected by India, calling the matter “strictly internal”. Nevertheless, Kashmir did not find place in the final Abu Dhabi declaration.

 

After 50 years Pakistan boycotted an OIC meeting due to India’s presence, is this then a failure of Pakistan’s diplomacy?

 

India-Pak ties: A détente or more hostilities?

Tensions between India and Pakistan that escalated in the wake of the Pulwama terror attack by JeM on February 14 reached a new height with the continuing border violations. India had carried out air strikes against the biggest training camp of JeM in Balakot on February 26, following which Pakistan claimed to have shot down two Indian fighter jets over Pakistan’s air space and arrested a pilot. The tensions thawed after Pakistan agreed to return the captured pilot. But the border escalations have continued with unprovoked firing from across the border took place in the Nowshera and Sunderbani sectors in Rajouri district and the Krishna Ghati sector in Poonch district. On 4 March, Indian Air Force has reported that a fighter jet has shot down a Pakistani military drone in Bikaner sector. The drone was reported to have used an air to air missile. What are the possible implications of the India Pakistan tensions? Is there a possibility of a détente? If yes, will the dialogue and talk yield results?

Firstly, the recent escalations in the Indo-Pak relations could be seen as part of a series of events that has its roots in the past and have continued in the present. The response to the cross border terrorism by India shows a larger political will to apply military force which is not only to sends a message to Pakistan to contain terrorism in its soil but also to Jammu and Kashmir. In response to India’s action Pakistan has retaliated with an aim to contain but has immediately changed course by calling for peace talks. Secondly, diplomatically the handling of the tension has incurred mixed results. India has been successful in increasing the pressure on Pakistan to declare JeM as a banned terrorist organisation and have received support from France, UK and US for the same. The move in the UN over the group shows good diplomatic move. Pakistan by calling for peace talks first has also been able to dilute the diplomacy to a certain extent. Since 2008, diplomatically India seems to be in a comfortable position now with no countries officially censoring or supporting India. However, China could be one stumbling block with the country condemning the attack but not issuing a strong statement against JeM. Thirdly, with the current rate of border incursions any form of constructive talks could prove only show and less conclusive. While Pakistan has been successful in altering the narrative of ‘Islamabad is being the problem’ by calling for peace talks, India is yet to respond to it. In India the issue has been politicised acquiring a nationalist rhetoric just before the elections.

 

The Trump-Kim summit: What next?

The second US-North Korea summit took place last week in Hanoi. In what began with a surprise in Singapore last year, this edition has been a popular disappointment. The summit mostly looked like a one man show on both sides with hardly any bottom up bureaucratic discussion. However, it had no significant agreements signed and ended prematurely. When Kim wanted a considerable relief from sanctions, the US demanded complete denuclearization before any economic relief. So, what does the failure mean? What’s next for the duo?

For Pyongyang, it has yet again failed to get sanctions relief even after trying to abandon or rather sideline its Nuclear Programme. Something which has remained at the fore for Korea’s survival and autonomy. Though, Kim has been prioritizing his economy, without the lifting of sanctions, he can hardly seek any development. While it seems that the Trump administration also doesn’t want to pay attention to resolving Korea’s economic crisis and denuclearization anytime soon. Probably, Trump has been flagging summits just to distract his critics from the domestic mishaps. Possibly, South Korea remains to be the biggest loser or beneficiary from the summit. With a lifting of sanctions, Seoul might have to continuously support Pyongyang financially while remains at a threat as long as a denuclearization deal does not take place.

There has been no information about the possibility of a next summit from both the parties. Trump seemed to rush back to his domestic politics almost visibly signaling that internal discussions on the matter remain largely sidelined at the White House. On the other hand, Kim decided to stay back at Vietnam for friendly gestures leaving hope for the future.

Print Bookmark

PREVIOUS COMMENTS

NIAS Global Politics Database
March 2024 | CWA # 1251

NIAS Africa Team

Africa This Week
NIAS Global Politics Database
February 2024 | CWA # 1226

NIAS Africa Team

Africa This Week
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1189

Hoimi Mukherjee | Hoimi Mukherjee is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Political Science in Bankura Zilla Saradamani Mahila Mahavidyapith.

Chile in 2023: Crises of Constitutionality
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1187

Aprajita Kashyap | Aprajita Kashyap is a faculty of Latin American Studies, School of International Studies at the Jawaharlal Nehru University New Delhi.

Haiti in 2023: The Humanitarian Crisis
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1185

Binod Khanal | Binod Khanal is a Doctoral candidate at the Centre for European Studies, School of International Studies, JNU, New Delhi.

The Baltic: Energy, Russia, NATO and China
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1183

Padmashree Anandhan | Padmashree Anandhan is a Research Associate at the School of Conflict and Security Studies, National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bangaluru.

Germany in 2023: Defence, Economy and Energy Triangle
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1178

​​​​​​​Ashok Alex Luke | Ashok Alex Luke is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Political Science at CMS College, Kottayam.

China and South Asia in 2023: Advantage Beijing?
The World This Year
December 2023 | CWA # 1177

Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri | Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri is a postgraduate student at the Department of Defence and Strategic Studies at the University of Madras, Chennai.

China and East Asia
The War in Ukraine
October 2023 | CWA # 1091

Annem Naga Bindhu Madhuri

Issues for Europe
IPRI Quarterly Forecasts I Triggers, Trends, and Trajectories
July 2023 | CWA # 1012

Bibhu Prasad Routray

Myanmar continues to burn
2022: The World This Year
December 2022 | CWA # 879

Padmashree Anandhan

The Ukraine War
Europe: Heatwaves, Wildfires, Droughts, and Ice Melt in Alps
November 2022 | CWA # 838

Rishma Banerjee

Tracing Europe's droughts
NIAS Africa Weekly
March 2022 | CWA # 705

NIAS Africa Team

In Focus: Libya
The World This Week: 150th Issue
December 2021 | CWA # 630

GP Team

Europe in 2021
Pakistan Reader
October 2021 | CWA # 588

Abigail Miriam Fernandez

TLP is back again
NIAS Fortnightly on Science, Technology & International Relations
August 2021 | CWA # 528

STIR Team

Space Tourism
Science, Technology and International Relations
September 2019 | CWA # 162

Lakshman Chakravarthy N

5G: A Primer
South Asia Monthly Brief (Nov 2018)
December 2018 | CWA # 71

Mahesh Bhatta | Centre for South Asian Studies, Kathmandu

Nepal
South Asia Monthly Brief (Nov 2018)
December 2018 | CWA # 70

Nasima Khatoon | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

The Maldives
South Asia Monthly Brief (Nov 2018)
December 2018 | CWA # 69

Harini Madhusudan | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

India
South Asia Monthly Brief (Nov 2018)
December 2018 | CWA # 68

Sourina Bej | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

Bangladesh
South Asia Monthly Brief (Nov 2018)
December 2018 | CWA # 67

Seetha Lakshmi Dinesh Iyer | Research Associate, ISSSP, NIAS

Afghanistan